Quantcast
Channel: Tags [recycle],[recycling] are a muddle, should we disambiguate, retag and burninate them? - Meta Stack Overflow
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2

Tags [recycle],[recycling] are a muddle, should we disambiguate, retag and burninate them?

$
0
0

There are currently tags , with no tag definition. The term and the tags seem to get generically used for several distinct unrelated meanings:

  1. Android recycler (a ViewGroup). There is an existing tag , and in 2017 there was also [recyclerview] which was aliased to it (18.3K hits).
  2. vector-recycling, in R language (repeating scalar or shorter vector arguments to give vector output)
  3. a) Recycling in ASP/C#/IIS/AppPool and 3b) C#/WPF. (Are these two or more distinct things? Is the latter generic view-recycling in GUIs, hence similar to Android?)
    • No idea. Some C# person needs to propose what do with these, and retag.
  4. Any other use-cases?
  5. Not to be confused with the tags [recycle-bin] and [trash], which exist in multiple languages, CMSes and OSes.

Main proposal: , tags are not needed and should be burninated


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2

Latest Images

Trending Articles





Latest Images